Spacecam: Anti-Wobbly Review
Jun 4th, 2007 by General Henz
Some background
If the story of Spacecam was told as a motion picture, the tale would follow the traditional
The initial story would be told through a musical montage, with imagery flashing onto the screen alternatively showing a young Ron Goodman, the passionate inventor pouring his soul into his work, and spinning newspapers providing a sense of passing time.
It’s 1971 and Goodman leaves the company that would later become Wescam to travel to
Showing an early commitment to technology tweaking that he would later become best known for, Goodman continued to iterate the X-Mount eventually rebranding it as the Spacecam. Spacecam is to aerial photography what BASF is to the rest of us. They don’t invent the core technology – they make the core technology better through trial and error and iterative improvements.

In 1991 Goodman and the Spacecam suffered a crushing-blow. While bravely battling Wobbly on Far and Away a devastating helicopter accident destroyed the only Spacecam. Fortunately both the helicopter pilot and Ron Goodman escaped without serious injury.
Where most people would have called it a day and moved on, Goodman left the accident with a renewed vigor and dedication to aerial cinematography. Over the following 10 years, Goodman not only rebuilt the Spacecam and increased inventory from one to four systems, he also continued to practice his craft as an aerial DoP, working on monster productions like Waterworld.
Living in the larger Wescam’s shadows for most of the 10 years following the crash, Goodman happily played the role of the scrappy underdog. However, he was never distracted from his singular focus of providing quality weapons for defeating Wobbly and constantly tweaked and reworked his systems.
Goodman’s hard work and perseverance paid off – for the past 5 years his Spacecam systems have been the leading weapon against Wobbly.
Goodman has tweaked his mature systems to obtain the highest level of performance that the core technology can provide, even complimenting the products where necessary with accessories that further advance performance beyond the technology’s capabilities.
Today, each Spacecam contains more than just the blood, sweat and tears of Ron Goodman. After years of work, the systems have grown to become an extension of Goodman himself.
My Review
Not being on the tightly controlled approved list at Spacecam, I had to obtain flight time on the sly. A few calls to friends in the industry and I was able to find an approved operator on a Spacecam job willing to let me take a turn at the controls during a “ferry flight.”
The system itself is truly something to behold. It’s a beautiful piece of equipment – almost a work of art. If the Spacecam were a car, it would be meticulously maintained and detailed classic with state-of-the-art performance tires and a brand new honking stereo. The spotless chrome shows nothing of the 25 year old chassis that lies at its core.
We set out on a cold morning at the end of ’06 and after a few lessons from the aerial DoP I soon found myself sitting with my hands on the mounted console. The pilot and I ran through a number of standard aerial shots and I was impressed with the anti-Wobbly performance that the system offered. Pushing the lens to longer focal lengths, the Spacecam handled all of the vibration that the helicopter tried to introduce into the image, producing a quality of shot unmatched in other systems that I’ve flown.

While the steering, complimented by the RAMS mount accessory that was additionally included in the kit, performed better than other aerial systems, it continued to leave something to be desired. I found the steering still moved laterally throughout a shot, in a ghost-like way, and on the whole was not as precise or responsive as I would have liked. While the RAMS mount accessory helped maintain the horizon longer than other aerial systems, the Spacecam eventually succumbed to the same horizon difficulties that plague all current aerial anti-Wobbly products.
The system I tested included the standard Spacecam camera and lens package – a Mitchell Mark II with an Angenieux lens and a 1000’ mag. While the Spacecam faces the same payload constraints as other anti-Wobbly aerial systems, Goodman’s ingenuity has enabled the integration of specialized payloads into the system. With this niche strategy for payload integration, the Spacecam can accept a range of nontraditional payloads – from a DCAM 65 – 15 to a proprietary 65mm-5 perf system.
The test system included Spacecam’s laser auto focus system, an additional accessory that claims to provide precision focusing while on the move. After trying this accessory I found it to be more of a gimmick than anything – setting my focus to near infinity everything I shot remained in focus.
Flying over a football stadium, nearing the end of our flight, I came to the realization that despite its limitations in steering, Goodman had a product to be proud of. Though based on a platform as old as many of its operators, Goodman’s dedication to tweaking has maximized the products performance and has crafted the leading weapon in the aerial anti-Wobbly arsenal.
While some of the accessories do not bring much additional value, others have allowed Goodman to extract an additional smidgen of performance from his systems. If you’re an aerial DoP and are able to get listed on Spacecams list of approved users, I recommend this aerial system for many aerial applications.
[update: discussion that was occurring within the comments to this post but on a different anti-Wobbly weapon have been moved here]
20 Responses to “Spacecam: Anti-Wobbly Review”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.


You all know that I worked WorldWorld. Are we talking about the same production, General? I don’t recall it being all kittens, cuddles and hugs.
Thanks for the kind words. Just a few corrections though. Everything that is shaped like a sphere is not a Wescam. While the X Mount was a modification of the Wescam, it was never “rebranded” as a SpaceCam. SpaceCam was a “clean sheet” design introduced in 1990 and applies unique technology involving torquer motors on all three axis, Wescam shifts the CG using motorized weights. This more than anything distinguishes SpaceCam from Wescam, adding fast response and power to the system. SpaceCam continues to evolve not only with mechanical updates, but with electronic and continuous software improvements. We prefer the evolutionary approach rather than the baby/bathwater scenario. The RAMS mounting system for SpaceCam has been flown to +-100 degrees of helicopter roll without affecting camera control or stability. SpaceCam mounts virtually all film format cameras, 35-4, 35-8, 65-5, 65-8 and 65-15p., as well as standard and HD 2/3″ and large format Genesis HD video cameras. So I think we deserve a little more on the payload versatility rating. Stop by our booth at CineGear with any questions and we will also introduce you to SnakeHead, the world’s first fully articulated, computer controlled and gyro stablilized periscope camera system for fixed wing prop and jet aircraft.
Ron.
Hey Ole Timer! Yes indeed WaterWord definitely was not all warm and fuzzy, but the material holds up amazingly well given the glut of CGI addiction out there today.
C’mon General, give Ron a fair crack - and get your shooter count in order!
Leatherpants - you’re right that our shooter count is out of order.
Good eye. We could use a scout like you in the anti-Wobbly brigade. We were enjoying too many shooters when we created Spacecam’s Jello chart. Now that I’ve recovered from the hang-over, I’ll adjust accordingly.
Oh Sooooo - Like that is it general? Or just a bad smeller?
I have no idea what you’re saying. Is that slang from where you’re from LP?
For those late to the party… the Shooter chart has now been adjusted.
comment on Flighthead has been moved to a new post.
comment on Flighthead has been moved to a new post.
…….Just to avoid confusion. Comment 9 and 10 from Arthur and Venus….have nothing to do with the SpaceCam review. The inclusion of Venus’ is especially misleading as it refers to SpaceCam to the Russian Arm video referenced in Arthur’s comment. General take charge!
Ron.
Venus’ comment refers to the Russian Arm referenced in Arthur’s note.
[…] on by a rightful request from Ron Goodman, a fellow Knight of the Wobbly Table, I have moved the discussion around the Flighthead away from […]
Okay troops, the misleading information should be cleaned up now. All previous comments on the Flighthead (that Ron is referring to) have been moved to this post.
Hi Ron,
my appologies for any confusion, you are quite right. I was responding to the Filmotechnic clip that Arthur posted, where I found it. I was not commenting on Spacecam at all. As you point out, it should not be happening in this area.
General, the peasants are revolting!
Issue resolved. It wasn’t a revolt, it was a small grenade of information that Arthur lobed into an incorrect conversation that I should have jumped on earlier.
Good housekeeping General.
T’was a grenade dressed in a casual observers clothing.
Cheers Ron.
The laser auto focusing system is an option on all SpaceCam systems. It does however require training to understand and use effectively. It’s value on most mundane daylight shooting blocked out by the typical Hollywood director is negligible. However, its use on approach shots in low light ending at 250 or 270mm is invaluable and it has proved itself countless times. Likewise, for tight vehicle tracking shots where camera to target distances are constantly varying, it is a godsend. The software options controlling the laser focusing system also allow for disregard of intervening objects and “trend continuation” when IR reflectivity is momentarily lost.
Ron.
[…] Ron Goodman, a fellow Knight of the Wobbly Table, accurately pointed out, “Everything that is shaped like a sphere is not a Wescam”. Another truism is that not every aerial anti-Wobbly weapon is a sphere. And that’s certainly […]
Ron!
I’m a concerned citizen writing to protest the use of your laser! Everyone knows that lasers from the sky cause series damage to both people and the environment (and even pets!)!
I have obtained some top secret confidential information from a US Army test of a laser from the sky! I think you’ll agree that the results are dramatic and should not be ignored!
If you watch the video, at about the 50 second mark, you’ll see why EVERYONE should be concerned! Lasers from the sky can cause SERIOUS trouble!